Grading for equity : what it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms / Joe Feldman.

By: Feldman, Joe [author.]Material type: TextTextPublisher: Thousand Oaks, California : Corwin, a SAGE publishing company, [2019]Edition: First editionDescription: xxviii, 266 pages ; 26 cmContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9781506391571Subject(s): Grading and marking (Students) -- United States | Discrimination in education -- United States | Minority students -- Rating of -- United States | Educational equalization -- United StatesDDC classification: 371.26 LOC classification: LB3051 | .F44 2019Summary: "For some time, traditional (A - F) grading practices have been under fire from a wide range of stakeholder. Grading policies are wildly inconsistent from classroom to classroom, frequently misguided, uninformed, and frequently based on subjective judgments. Of even more concern, our grading practices exacerbate the achievement gap. It is well-documented that African-American and Latino students, boys, as well as special education students, are disproportionately suspended and expelled, influenced by teachers' unconscious but biased judgments of student behavior. Virtually ignored is how teachers' incorporate subjective and non-academic criteria into their grades (through criteria such as student attitude, "participation", and "effort"), and how approach to grading contributes to these same students' disproportionately high course failure rates and disproportionately low placement in advanced academic tracks"-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Books Books Chalimbana Main Library
Social Sciences
Social Sciences 371.26 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 978-1-5063-9157-1

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"For some time, traditional (A - F) grading practices have been under fire from a wide range of stakeholder. Grading policies are wildly inconsistent from classroom to classroom, frequently misguided, uninformed, and frequently based on subjective judgments. Of even more concern, our grading practices exacerbate the achievement gap. It is well-documented that African-American and Latino students, boys, as well as special education students, are disproportionately suspended and expelled, influenced by teachers' unconscious but biased judgments of student behavior. Virtually ignored is how teachers' incorporate subjective and non-academic criteria into their grades (through criteria such as student attitude, "participation", and "effort"), and how approach to grading contributes to these same students' disproportionately high course failure rates and disproportionately low placement in advanced academic tracks"-- Provided by publisher.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha